Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Thomas v. Polar Leasing Company et al
as 2:2023cv11354
Plaintiff:
Sam Franklin Thomas
Defendant:
Polar Leasing Company, Wayne Burllington, Bart Tarppenas and others
USA v. Layton Thomas
as 23-11001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAYTON FRANKLIN THOMAS
Carroll v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00845
Petitioner:
Franklin Thomas Carroll
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00568
Defendant:
Kate Brown and Kate Hendricks
Plaintiff:
Donald Franklin Thomas, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv22052
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN THOMAS, THERESE BLAND and THE ESTATE OF THERESE M. BLAND
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arce v. Kelso et al
as 5:2017cv01108
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis Arce
Defendant:
Carlos Herrera, Darryl Hunter, Elizibeth Janat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin-Thomas v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01260
Plaintiff:
Angelic Franklin-Thomas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
THOMAS et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al
as 2:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
LORETTA THOMAS and FRANKLIN THOMAS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK and ZUCKER, GOLDBERG, & ACKERMAN, LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
LaPlante v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv30126
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Franklin Thomas LaPlante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv00450
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Franklin Thomas
Defendant:
Tyler Turnbough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
