Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Russell v. Rice et al
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Herbert P. Russell
Defendant:
Fred Rice and William D. West doing business as Klassic Rides, LLC
Rice v. Jackson County ADC et al
as 1:2021cv00231
Plaintiff:
Fred Rice
Defendant:
Jackson County ADC, Mike Ezell and Unknown McCoy
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. State Of Illinois et al
as 1:2015cv01332
Plaintiff:
Maceo G. Willis, Jr.
Defendant:
State Of Illinois, Illinois Dept. of Corrections, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.M. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
K. M.
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Dewayne Estes and Fred Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00360
Plaintiff:
Kenji Moore
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Dewayne Estes and Fred Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Inge v. Echols et al
as 7:2012cv02495
Plaintiff:
Derrick Inge
Defendant:
Andrew Echols, Fred Rice, Tyree Murphy and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STICO Mutual Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group v. Rice et al
as 6:2011cv01672
Plaintiff:
STICO Mutual Insurance Company, Risk Retention Group
Defendant:
Fred Rice, Fred C. Rice LLC and Fred Rice LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COUCH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2011cv00441
Defendant:
CITY OF NOBLESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL DIVISION, HAMILTON COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEE COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
