Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hubbard II v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv30025
Plaintiff:
Raymond Frederick Hubbard II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HUBBARD v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv03351
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CARLTON FREDERICK HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hubbard v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03407
Plaintiff:
Carlton Fredrick Hubbard and Carlton Frederick Hubbard
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Charles Graham v. Theodis Beck
as 12-6894
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES FRANCIS GRAHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK
Respondent:
FREDERICK HUBBARD
Adrian Watkins v. Boyd Bennett
as 11-6117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN DOMINIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOYD BENNETT, BETTY BROWN, BECKY POPE and others
MARTIN v. HUBBARD et al
as 1:2009cv01017
Plaintiff:
JEREMY R. MARTIN
Defendant:
FREDERICK HUBBARD and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. HUBBARD et al
as 1:2009cv00876
Plaintiff:
JEREMY R. MARTIN
Defendant:
FREDERICK HUBBARD and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2009cv00770
Plaintiff:
WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
FREDERICK HUBBARD and PATRICIA L. CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hubbard et al
as 5:2009ct03157
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Frederick Hubbard and Patricia L. Chavis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ian Campbell v. Roy Cooper, III
as 09-7468
Petitioner - Appellant:
IAN AULDEN CAMPBELL
Respondent - Appellee:
ROY COOPER and FREDERICK HUBBARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
