Cases 1 - 10 of 10
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
Woodhull Freedom Foundation, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-5105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Woodhull Freedom Foundation, Human Rights Watch, Eric Koszyk and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Merrick B. Garland, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Amicus Curiae:
Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics of Rhode Island, "COYOTE-RI", Black and Pink MA, The Community United for Safety and Protection and others
WOODHULL FREEDOM FOUNDATION et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01552
Defendant:
Attorney General JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS
Plaintiff:
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, JESSE MALEY, WOODHULL FREEDOM FOUNDATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition v. W. Basham, et al
as 16-5047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition, (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism)
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Graylan Scott Hagler, Pastor, Plymouth Congregational Church, Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation and National Council of Arab Americans
Defendant - Appellee:
W. Ralph Basham, In official capacity as Director, U.S. Secret Service and Sally Jewell, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior
Act Now to Stop War and End Ra, et al v. DC
as 12-7140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition and Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
Act Now to Stop War and End Ra, et al v. DC
as 12-7139
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition and Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation
Defendant - Appellant:
District of Columbia
Act Now to Stop War and End Ra, et al v. DC
as 08-7098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition and Muslim American Society Freedom Foundation
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia
Comcast Corporation v. FCC
as 08-1291
Petitioner:
Comcast Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
NBC Universal, National Cable & Telecommunications Association and Qwest Communications International Inc.
Intervenor For Respondent:
Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Free Press and Public Knowledge and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
The Progress & Freedom Foundation, James B. Speta, Professor and Glen O. Robinson
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Barbara van Schewick, Professor, Lawrence Lessig, Jack M. Balkin and others
Comcast Corporation v. FCC
as 08-1114
Petitioner:
Comcast Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Bright House Networks, LLC, Cable Television & Communications Association of Illinois, Cablevision Systems Corporation and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
CCTV Center for Media & Democracy, Office of Communication, Inc., United Church of Christ and Center for the Creative Community, Inc. d.b.a. Center for Creative Voices in Media, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
The Progress & Freedom Foundation and Verizon
Sabre Inc v. DOT, et al
as 04-1073
Petitioner:
Sabre Inc.
Respondent:
United States Department of Transportation and Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of Transportation
Intervenor:
Amadeus Global Travel Distribution, S.A.
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Travel Agents, INC
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
The Progress & Freedom Foundation and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
