Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Friends of the Earth v. Jennifer Granholm et al
as 2:2024cv02678
Plaintiff:
Friends of the Earth
Defendant:
Jennifer Granholm and United States Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, et al. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al.
as 23-3884
Petitioner:
SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE and FRIENDS OF THE EARTH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, The Wilderness Society, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Debra Haaland, Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, et al. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, et al.
as 23-852
Petitioner:
SAN LUIS OBISPO MOTHERS FOR PEACE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Alaska Wildlife Alliance, et al v. USFWS, et al
as 23-35299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SHANNON ESTENOZ, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION and STATE OF ALASKA
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Earth and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Petitioner:
ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
North Slope Borough, Kuukpik Corporation and State of Alaska
Amicus Curiae:
Lisa Murkowski, Dan Sullivan, Mary Sattler Peltola and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. NOAA Fisheries, et al
as 23-15166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and FRIENDS OF THE EARTH
Defendant / Appellant:
NOAA FISHERIES, JANET COIT, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, U.S. COAST GUARD and others
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Regan et al
as 3:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth and Marcelin Keever
Defendant:
EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
