Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Watson v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv04033
Plaintiff:
James T Watson and James T Watson
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Weingarten et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00218
Plaintiff:
Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten and others
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., Au Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Valdez v. AU Optronics Corp.
as 2:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Valdez
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp. America, AU Optronics Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Valdez v. AU Optronics Corp.
as 1:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Valdez
Defendant:
Au Optronics Corp. America, AU Optronics Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Coyle v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02088
Plaintiff:
Peter Coyle and Peter Coyle
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Van Dyk v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 5:2007cv04010
Plaintiff:
Dustin Van Dyk
Defendant:
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
