Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 102
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff: Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant: Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified: Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor: David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party: James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master: Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff: Robin McEntee
In Re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other: Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IMCA, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05348
Plaintiff: IMCA, Inc.
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Defrancisco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05020
Plaintiff: Mauricio Defrancisco and Mauricio Defrancisco
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Eisler v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv05019
Plaintiff: Scott Eisler
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Weingarten v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04931
Plaintiff: Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten, Marcia Weingarten and others
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pulasky v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv04934
Plaintiff: John Pulasky
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Feser v. AU Optronics Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv04074
Plaintiff: Gail Feser
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Bates v. AU Optronics Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03671
Plaintiff: Heidi Bates
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Holtkamp v. AU Optronics Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv03366
Plaintiff: Lynne M. Holtkamp
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Oyadomori et al v. Fujitsu America Inc et al
as 4:2007cv03369
Plaintiff: Cade Oyadomori, Cade Oyadomori, Cade Oyadomori and others
Defendant: Fujitsu America Inc, Fujitsu Limited, Inc., Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?