Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Department of Transportation v. United States Department of the Interior, Division of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2020cv00361
Defendant:
Lindmark Signs, Lonnie Taylor, Bertha Mae Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0357
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Department of Transportation v. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 6:2020cv00144
Defendant:
Lonnie Taylor, Carolyn Ann Johnson, E. Darlene Johnson Cusher and others
Plaintiff:
Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0357
Wilson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv02033
Plaintiff:
Janice G. Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America , John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 5:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, Barack Obama, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Denning et al
as 5:2010cv03066
Plaintiff:
Henry G. Wilson
Defendant:
Frank Denning, Johnson County Adult Detention Center, Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raynor v. Wentz, et al
as 09-7079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA RAYNOR
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL WENTZ, CHERYL DICKENSHEETS, DANE BAYERS and others
Raynor v. Wentz et al
as 6:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Linda Raynor
Defendant:
Bill Wentz, Cheryl Dickensheets, Dane Bayers and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
