Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Theodore Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-55177
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE O'DELL WILSON, and those similarly situated
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Theodore Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-55183
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE O'DELL WILSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Theodore Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-55174
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE O'DELL WILSON, and on behalf of those similarly situated
Respondent - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv05268
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Does, G. D. Gross and others
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv05296
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv04186
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
