Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2025cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Marshall v. I K K Investments
as 3:2024cv01512
Defendant:
I K K Investments
Plaintiff:
Robbie G Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jason Latrell Thomas v. G. Marhsall et al

as 2:2022cv05446
Plaintiff:
Jason Latrell Thomas
Defendant:
G. Marshall, J. Villa, G. Ortega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Sanders v. G Marshall
as 21-55173
Respondent / Appellee:
G MARSHALL
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS
Harris v. Nationstar et al

as 3:2021cv00024
Defendant:
Chris G Marshall, Glenn Onstad, Charles Steven Covington and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne-Jemon Harris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tonney Killensworth v. D. Godfrey, et al
as 20-55784
Defendant / Appellee:
B. LEGIER, R. AGUIRRE, D. GODFREY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONNEY KILLENSWORTH
Chase, Jr. v. Maryland Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv02174
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Corrections, Eastern Correctional Institution, Correctional Officer Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Chase, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Troy Alexander Sanders v. G. Marshall

as 5:2020cv00885
Petitioner:
Troy Alexander Sanders
Respondent:
G Marshall
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Marc Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Troy Sanders v. USDC-CAFR
as 20-71119
Petitioner:
TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS and G MARSHALL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
MARSHALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18469
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN G MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.