Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Larry Mosley v. Gene Johnson
as 11-6927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY D. MOSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections, WALRATH, Mr.; Unit Manager, MS. MASSENBURG, Grievance Coordinator and others
Defendant:
JOHN M. JABE, Deputy Director of Operations, JAMES R. CAMACHE, Deputy Director of Community Operations and DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director, VDOC
Floyd Bolding v. Department of Correction
as 11-6926
Petitioner - Appellant:
FLOYD DINSDALE BOLDING
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. M. VAUGHN, Warden of Nottoway State Prison and GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Edward Tinsley v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7077
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES TINSLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Joshua Johnson v. Gene Johnson
as 09-7454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA MITCH JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, GARY BASS, Chief of Classification of the Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Walter Wilson, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 09-6416
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER STEVE WILSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Respondent - None:
STATE OF VIRGINIA
Montusa Pace v. Gene Johnson
as 08-7740
Petitioner - Appellant:
MONTUSA KARUNDO T. PACE
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Zachary Cooper, Sr. v. Gene Johnson
as 08-6385
Petitioner - Appellant:
ZACHARY COOPER, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Giarratano v. Johnson
as 06-7890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. GIARRATANO
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and TRACEY S. RAY, Warden of Red Onion State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
