Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02294
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Ventura Coastkeeper et al v. Genon Energy Inc et al
as 2:2012cv09060
Defendant:
Genon Americas Inc, Genon Asset Management LLC, Genon California North LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ventura Coastkeeper and Wishtoyo Foundation
Bushansky v. Genon Energy, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv02257
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
GenOn Energy, Inc. , Edward R Muller , E Spencer Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Hughes v. Genon Energy, Inc.
as 4:2012cv01557
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hughes
Defendant:
Genon Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
GenOn Energy, Inc. v. EPA
as 11-1323
Petitioner:
GenOn Energy, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC et al v. SOLOMON et al
as 3:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC , PPL BRUNNER ISLAND, LLC , PPL HOLTWOOD, LLC and others
Defendant:
LEE A. SOLOMON , JEANNE M. FOX , JOSEPH L. FIORDALISO and others
Movant:
PJM INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER COALITION and NEW JERSEY, DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL
Intervenor_defendant:
CPV POWER DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC et al v. SOLOMON et al
as 2:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC , PPL BRUNNER ISLAND, LLC , PPL HOLTWOOD, LLC and others
Defendant:
LEE A. SOLOMON , JEANNE M. FOX , JOSEPH L. FIORDALISO and others
Movant:
PJM INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER COALITION , CPV Power Development, Inc. and NEW JERSEY, DIVISION OF RATE COUNSEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
