Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carter III v. Department of Children Services et al
as 3:2019cv00856
Defendant:
Department of Children Services, Keisha Foster, DCS - Foster Care Division and others
Plaintiff:
George L. Carter III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George Carter v. Brad Livingston, Director, et al
as 17-50947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE L. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JOE GRIMES, Director of Prison and Jail Operations for Region IV and others
George Carter v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50216
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE L. CARTER
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Carter v. Davis
as 5:2016cv01322
Petitioner:
George L. Carter
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Livingstone et al
as 5:2016cv01050
Defendant:
Jorge Alvarez, Terri Y. Driver, William Dubose, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
George L. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devine et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02035
Defendant:
G.D. Searle, LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Pharmacia Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Devine, Shirley Callis, Vincent Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEVINE et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00205
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DEVINE, SHIRLEY CALLIS, VINCENT JACKSON and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PHARMACIA CORP. and G.D. SEARLE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
