Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Shakour Brown v. George Little, et al
as 25-1829
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR A. BROWN
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of the Department of Corrections and DR SAAVEDRA
Isaac Naranjo v. George Little, et al
as 25-1733
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, TABB BICKELL, STEPHEN BUZAS and others
MOTON v. HARRY et al
as 2:2025cv00365
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MOTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE M. LITTLE, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalil Hammond v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 25-1347
Plaintiff:
KHALIL K. HAMMOND
Defendant:
DR. LAUREL HARRY, Current D.O.C. Secretary, GEORGE M. LITTLE, Former Acting D.O.C. Secretary, ULLI KLEMM and others
Jamar Cardwell v. Melinda Adams, et al
as 25-1142
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MELINDA ADAMS, SHANE DADY, Deputy Superintendent, SERGEANT CAMPBELL and others
Alfonzo Exum v. George Little, et al
as 25-1104
Plaintiff:
ALFONZO EXUM
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and JOHN E. WETZEL, et. al.
Henderson et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2025cv00049
Defendant:
Michael Wenerowicz, Laurel Harry, Brian Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
David Thompson, Malika Henderson, Khalil Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMMOND v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv05526
Defendant:
ULLI KLEMM, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, DR. LAUREL R. HARRY and others
Plaintiff:
KHALIL HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2024cv04179
Defendant:
GEORGE M. LITTLE, ULRICH KLEMM and LAUREL HARRY
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MALIK MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Edwards, et al v. J. Rivello, et al
as 24-2031
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS, LAEL BROWN, MUWSA GREEN and others
Defendant:
N. DAVIS, Medical Department Supervisor, A. WAKEFIELD, Facility Grievance Coordinator, GEORGE M. LITTLE, Secretary of Department of Correction and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
