Cases 1 - 10 of 14
George Davis, III v. John Woodson
as 22-6543
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE W. DAVIS, III
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN A. WOODSON, Warden
Davis Bey v. Woodson
as 3:2020cv00973
Petitioner:
George W. Davis Bey
Respondent:
John A. Woodson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis-Bey v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2020cv00673
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Plaintiff:
George W. Davis Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
George Davis, IV v. USW Local 13-423
as 18-40259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE W. DAVIS, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
LOCAL 13-423, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED, INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-41605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Davis, IV v. USW Local 13-423
as 1:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
George W. Davis, IV
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, Local Number 13-423
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04784
Plaintiff:
George W. Davis , Duane P. Ford , Cynthia E. Ford and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Davis et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2013cv01462
Plaintiff:
George W. Davis , Duane P. Ford , Cynthia E. Ford and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
DAVIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37985
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W. DAVIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
