Cases 31 - 40 of 1,372
Sumrall v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05395
Plaintiff:
Ammon Ra Sumrall
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Timothy Ward, Alan Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Hays State Prison et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Hays State Prison and Georgia Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL EARL MURPHY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN SPRAYBERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolden v. Beasley et al
as 6:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bernard Bolden, II
Defendant:
Warden Beasley, Assistant Warden Folks, Officer Sullivan, CO II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Hays State Prison et al
as 4:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rice
Defendant:
Hays State Prison and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kwane Dozier v. Warden, et al
as 23-13468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KWANE TYREE DOZIER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Bryan Jones v. Telfair SP Warden, et al
as 23-13459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN LAWSON JONES, a.k.a. Vizion
Defendant / Appellee:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN VERONICA STEWART, DEPUTY WARDEN MARCUS and others
Banks v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv04517
Plaintiff:
Angelo Bernard Banks
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Corrections and Unk. Admin.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
