Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00262
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Bankruptcy None
Goodman, et al v. USDC-AZT
as 08-70698
: In re: GRANT H. GOODMAN, NORTHERN HIGHLANDS I, II, LLC, STIRLING BRIDGE, LLC, NORTHERN HIGHLANDS I TRIAD STIRLING BRIDGE, LLC and others
Petitioner: GRANT H. GOODMAN, (individually,) equity holders, shareholders, interest hodlers, creditors, derivatively, and guarantors/sureties, NORTHERN HIGHLANDS I, II, LLC, (Arizona LLC's), STIRLING BRIDGE, LLC, NORTHERN HIGHLANDS I TRIAD STIRLING BRIDGE, LLC, (a Delaware limited liability company) and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Goodman et al v. Comerica Bank et al
as 4:2007cv00163
Plaintiff: Grant H. Goodman, Northern Highlands I, II, LLC, Northern Highlands I Triad Stirling Bridge, LLC and others
Defendant: Comerica Bank, ARPL-DRAKE Cement, Taiheiyo Cement USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Type: Contract Anti-Trust
Goodman et al v. Comerica Bank et al
as 4:2007at10068
Plaintiff: Grant H. Goodman, Northern Highlands I, II, LLC, Northern Highlands I Triad Stirling Bridge, LLC and others
Defendant: Comerica Bank, ARPL-DRAKE Cement, Taiheiyo Cement USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?