Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00536
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY et al v. NATURES EAGLE LLC,
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff: PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY and GIANT EAGLE, INC.
Defendant: NATURES EAGLE LLC, and NATURE'S EAGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3039
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Minute Men, Inc. et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45306
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Minute Men, Inc. and Minute Men Select, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01209
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
County of Cuyahoga v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2017op45004
Defendant: Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., CVS Pharmacy Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff: State of Ohio, Michael C. O'Malley and Cuyahoga County of Ohio
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Walgreen Co., HBC Service Company and Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: John and Jane Does
Interested Party: State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Robertson v. Taylor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff: Melvin Robertson
Defendant: Officer Robert Taylor, City of Cleveland and Giant Eagle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?