Cases
Gila River Indian Community, et al v. U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15629
Plaintiff - Appellant: GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, a federally-recognized Indian tribe and GILA RIVER HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, a wholly-owned and subordinate entity of the Gila River Indian Community
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and ROBERT A. MCDONALD, Former Secretary, United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Gila River Indian Community, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-15642
Plaintiff: GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, CITY OF GLENDALE, MICHAEL SOCACIU and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN MCCOMISH, Arizona Legislature, Majority Leader, KIRK ADAMS, Arizona Legislature, Speaker of the House, CHUCK GRAY, Arizona Legislature, Senature Majority Leader and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION
Gila River Indian Community, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-15641
Plaintiff: GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, CITY OF GLENDALE, MICHAEL SOCACIU and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DELVIN JOHN TERRY, CELESTINO RIOS, BRANDON RIOS and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff: JOHN MCCOMISH, Arizona Legislature, Majority Leader, CHUCK GRAY, Arizona Legislature, Senature Majority Leader, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION
Gila River Indian Community, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-15639
Plaintiff - Appellant: GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Plaintiff: CITY OF GLENDALE, MICHAEL SOCACIU, DELVIN JOHN TERRY and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff: JOHN MCCOMISH, Arizona Legislature, Majority Leader, CHUCK GRAY, Arizona Legislature, Senature Majority Leader, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION
State of Arizona, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-15633
Plaintiff: GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, CITY OF GLENDALE, MICHAEL SOCACIU and others
Intervenor-Plaintiff: JOHN MCCOMISH, Arizona Legislature, Majority Leader and CHUCK GRAY, Arizona Legislature, Senature Majority Leader
Petitioner-intervenor: KIRK ADAMS, Arizona Legislature, Speaker of the House
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION
City of Glendale, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-15631
Plaintiff: GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, DELVIN JOHN TERRY, CELESTINO RIOS and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: CITY OF GLENDALE, MICHAEL SOCACIU and GARY HIRSCH
Intervenor-Plaintiff: JOHN MCCOMISH, Arizona Legislature, Majority Leader, CHUCK GRAY, Arizona Legislature, Senature Majority Leader and STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner-intervenor: KIRK ADAMS, Arizona Legislature, Speaker of the House
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?