Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dwyer et al v. GK Development, Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Cathleen Dwyer and Daniel Dwyer
Defendant:
GK Development, Inc doing business as Holiday Village Mall and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Cochran v. GK Development, Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sun Cochran
Defendant:
GK Development, Inc, GK Holiday Village, LLC, Holiday Village Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
The Gap, Inc. v. GK Development, Inc., et al
as 16-1223
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The Gap, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
GK Development, Inc. and Columbia Grand Forks, LLC
Phalen v. GK Development, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01046
Plaintiff:
Robert Phalen
Defendant:
GK Development, Inc., GK Retail Properties Fund III, LLC, GK Securities, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Gap, Inc. v. GK Development, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
The Gap, Inc.
Defendant:
GK Development, Inc. and Columbia Grand Forks, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Columbia Grand Forks, LLC and GK Development, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christian Holdings, Inc. et al v. GK Development, Inc. et al
as 9:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christian Holdings, Inc. and Angelo Christian
Defendant:
GK Development, Inc. and Sbarro, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Lufkin GKD Partners, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Christian Holdings, Inc. et al v. GK Development, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Christian Holdings, Inc. and Angelo Christian
Defendant:
GK Development, Inc. and Sbarro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
