Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Boggs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv00121
Defendant:
Navistar Inc., Gardner Denver, Inc., Meritor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Raegena Boggs and Paul Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puffinberger et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Navistar Inc., Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company, Sundyne Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert "John" Puffinberger and Francis Puffinberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Swiger et al v. A.R. Wilfley & Sons, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00117
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc., PREMIERE REFRACTORIES, INC., Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Swiger and Lyle Swiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Davis, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2013cv32308
Plaintiff:
John Edward Davis and Gloria A. Davis
Defendant:
3M Company, A. W. Chesterton Company, Ajax Magnethermic Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sparks v. 4520 Corp., Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14276
Cross Defendant:
Pennzoil-Quaker State Company, Joy Technologies, Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Townsend & Bottum, Inc., Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Oglebay Norton Company and others
Plaintiff:
Victor W. Sparks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Amick et al v. Allied Glove Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv06593
Plaintiff:
Barbara E. Amick and Eldon E. Amick
Defendant:
Allied Glove Corporation, American Electric Power Company, Inc. , Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Seyller et al v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2008cv01250
Plaintiff:
Gary Ivan Seyller, Sr., Gary Ivan Seyller, Sr., Gary Ivan Seyller, Sr. and others
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, A. W. Chesterton Company, Adience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
