Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Deluca et al v. GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP et al
as 1:2019cv10498
Plaintiff:
Drew R. Naylor, Barbara Deluca, Peggy Rollo and others
Defendant:
GPB Holdings II, LP, Axiom Capital Management, Inc., Mark Martino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Stanley S. and Millicent R. Barasch Living Trust v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01079
Defendant:
Doe Auditors 1 through 10, Axiom Capital Management, Inc., Scott Naugle and others
Plaintiff:
Millicent R. Barasch, The Stanley S. and Millicent R. Barasch Living Trust and Loretta DeHay
Petitioner:
Kinnie Ma Individual Retirement Account, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, Jeffery S. Gramm Individual Retirement Account, Corri Rene Eden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Kinnie Ma Individual Retirement Account v. Ascendant Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01050
Defendant:
Avere Financial Group, LLC n/k/a Parsonex Capital Markets LLC, Kingsbury Capital, Inc., Innovation Partners LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kinnie Ma Individual Retirement Account, Karen Loch, Victor Wade Individual Retirement Account and others
Consolidated Defendant:
GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP, GPB Holdings II, LP, RSM US LLP and others
Petitioner:
Millicent R. Barasch
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Loretta DeHay and The Stanley S. and Millicent R. Barasch Living Trust
Cross Defendant:
Evan Myrianthopoulos and Scott Naugle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lash v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05622
Defendant:
David Gentile, GPB Holdings Automotive, LLC, GPB Holdings, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lash v. GPB Capital Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv05622
Defendant:
David Gentile, GPB Holdings Automotive, LLC, GPB Holdings, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
