Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Sullivan v. Graham, et al
as 23-3153
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN M. GRAHAM, JR., MELINDA YOUNG, DAVID CLYMER and others
Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al
as 23-3154
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee: THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., CAROL MORRIS, LADUSKA ANNE HANEY and others
Hale-El v. Boulder County Jail, et al
as 23-1215
Plaintiff / Appellant: COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant / Appellee: BOULDER COUNTY JAIL, SEAN METCALF, Badge #1469, BADGE #1418 and others
White v. Graham
as 23-5069
Petitioner: KIMBERLY GRAHAM
Respondent: TAMIKA WHITE, Warden
Quintana v. Utah State Prison, et al
as 23-4087
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee: UTAH STATE PRISON, employee, FNU SPOTTS, Officer, FNU GRAHAM, Officer and others
Quintana v. Utah State Prison, et al
as 23-4064
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee: UTAH STATE PRISON, FNU SPOTTS, FNU GRAHAM and others
Puskarich v. BNSF Railway Company
as 22-8065
Plaintiff / Appellant: SARA A. PUSKARICH
Not Yet Classified: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant: GRAHAM-WHITE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, DBA Omini Group Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Graham
as 22-6149
Petitioner: In re: JONATHAN SCOTT GRAHAM
Respondent: LUKE PETTIGREW, Warden
Graham v. City of Lone Grove, Oklahoma, et al
as 22-7032
Plaintiff / Appellee: TRAVIS GRAHAM
Defendant / Appellant: GILBERT HENSLEY, individually
Defendant: CITY OF LONE GROVE, OKLAHOMA, an Oklahoma municipality, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR CARTER COUNTY, an Oklahoma political subdivision, CHRIS BRYANT, in his official and individual capacities and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?