Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,140
Paytient Technologies, Inc. v. Graham
as 4:2023cv01735
Plaintiff: Paytient Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: Jacob Graham
USA v. Kenneth Graham
as 23-3197
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH GRAHAM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01075
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bloom et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023mc80319
Plaintiff: Everett Bloom, David Lindholm and Jack Graham
Defendant: META PLATFORMS, INC.
Niekamp et al. v. Watts Guerra LLP et al.
as 3:2023cv02289
Plaintiff: Christopher J. Niekamp and Randall D. Hebrink
Defendant: Watts Guerra LLP, Bassford Remele PA, Gustafson Gluek PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scott v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff: Robert Scott
Defendant: Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Philips v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01284
Plaintiff: Mary Philips
Defendant: Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others
Serrato v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
as 23-3348
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL ANGELO SERRATO
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ROMMEL CHAVEZ, Long Beach Police Officer, individual, Deputy BALTAZAR, ID No 528239, Deputy for (MCJ) 2nd Floor FM Shift, individual and others
Haynes, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 23-3327
Plaintiff: CHERYL COTTERILL
Defendant / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
Defendant: MATHEW MASON, HUGH HALL, GREGORY HICKS and others
Not Yet Classified: GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES, ATTORNEY, counsel for plaintiff
Agarwal v. Splunk Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv05680
Plaintiff: Avantika Agarwal
Defendant: Splunk Inc., Graham V. Smith, Mark Carges and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?