Cases 1 - 10 of 1,999
Jackson v. Wabash County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Chad Jackson
Defendant:
Wabash County Sheriff, Brooke Murphy, Ms. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. MAINEHEALTH, et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
PETER E GRAHAM, MD
Defendant:
MAINEHEALTH doing business as MAINEHEALTH CANCER CARE doing business as MAINE MEDICAL PARTNERS and AMIT SANYAL, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Graham III v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Frank Graham III
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The State of Texas v. Graham
as 3:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
Christopher Lauren Graham
Parlon v. The United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2024cv10886
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Defendant:
The United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Shoba Sivaprassad Wadhia and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
