Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Graham v. Louisville Metro Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00383
Plaintiff:
Artius J. Graham
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Corrections , Trinity Services Group and Louisville Metro Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neal v. Vanhoose et al
as 3:2018cv00125
Petitioner:
Roy C. Neal
Respondent:
Lelia A. Vanhoose, Larry R. Brock, Michael A. Bolcas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King et al v. Graham et al
as 6:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Denny King , Versie King , Belinda Bolin and others
Defendant:
Tommy L. Graham , Lamar Investments, LLC , The Friday Interests, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benton v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
Louisville Metropolitan Government, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, Mark Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Bottom
as 1:2016cv00170
Petitioner:
Norman Graham
Respondent:
Don Bottom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mayer et al v. David Graham Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Mayer
Defendant:
David Graham Trucking, LLC , Ryan Romig , Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Photographic Illustrators Corporation v. A.W. Graham Lumber, LLC
as 5:2016cv00230
Plaintiff:
Photographic Illustrators Corporation
Defendant:
A.W. Graham Lumber, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00008
Defendant:
Horace N. Graham, Jr. and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lee v. Rescare, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Lee , Sherry Bashful , La'Shauna A. Brown and others
Defendant:
Rescare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
