Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Cocroft et al v. Graham et al
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Clarence Cocroft and Tru Source Medical Cannabis, LLC
Defendant:
Chris Graham, Pat Daily and Dr. Daniel P. Edney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shumaker et al v. Graham, et al
as 1:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Patrick Daniel Shumaker and Patrick Leonel Shumaker
Defendant:
Christopher Graham and Owner and Operator of OKAY FOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00728
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Teeuwissen et al v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Pieter Teeuwissen, Anthony R. Simon and Simon & Teeuwissen, PLLC
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, David Archie, Credell Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mize et al v. Graham
as 1:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Allen H. Mize and Hobbs Construction of MS, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Graham
as 5:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
Donny R. Wilson
Defendant:
Christopher Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griggs et al v. Graham
as 3:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Humanist Association, American Atheists, Inc., L. Kim Gibson and others
Defendant:
Chris Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
