Cases 1 - 10 of 417
SPENCE v. TOLBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
KENYON J. SPENCE
Defendant:
SGT. TOLBERT and SGT. LENWOOD GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CITY OF GRAHAM v. THE 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
CITY OF GRAHAM
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, AGC, INC., AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crowder et al v. Burress et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Crowder and Diane L. Crowder
Defendant:
Kimberly Burress, Bethany Herman, Gregory Moss, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. USA
as 7:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Graham v. O'Malley **
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Crystal Graham
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Graham v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Crystal Graham
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
