Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund et al v. Bayer Aktiengesellschaft et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04737
Plaintiff: City of Grand Rapids Police & Fire Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System, Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund and others
Defendant: Wolfgang Nickl, Johannes Dietsch, Werner Baumann and others
Petitioner: Ohio Carpenters Pension Fund and Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
Not Classified By Court: Bank of New York Mellon and Cowen and Company, LLC
In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv02690
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Brian Roberts and others
Plaintiff: Matias Malig, as Trustee for the Malig Family Trust
Petitioner: Harold Tholen, Deep Dinesh Patel, Rakesh Khanna and others
Interested Party: Frederic Lande, Palm Bay Police & Firefighters' Pension Fund and Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND v. ALBER
as 2:2020cv01216
Plaintiff: GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND
Defendant: MARLIN ALBER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
IN RE: PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv08049
Defendant: Martin King, Andre Calantzopoulos, Philip Morris International Inc and others
Plaintiff: City of Westland Police and Fire Retirement System
Interested Party: Wayne Gilchrist
Intervenor: Union Asset Management Holding AG
Petitioner: Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund and Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
SCHWARTZMILLER v. GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND et al
as 2:2019cv00310
Defendant: CARPENTERS' COMBINED FUNDS, INC. and GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND
Plaintiff: WILLIAM SCHWARTZMILLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund v. Philip Morris International Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv08814
Defendant: Andre Calantzopoulos, Martin G. King, Jacek Olczak and others
Plaintiff: Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Pension Fund
Intervenor: Union Asset Management Holding AG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Spencer Abrams, et al v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al
as 17-80001
Plaintiff - Respondent: SPENCER ABRAMS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF HAWAII, GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., LONNIE M. SMITH, GARY S. GUTHART and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LAW PROFESSORS and FORMER SEC OFFICIALS
GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND v. REED
as 3:2016cv00114
Plaintiff: GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND
Defendant: GERTRUDE REED
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND v. JACKSON
as 2:2016cv00200
Plaintiff: GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND
Defendant: JOANNE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Elmachtoub, et al v. ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1491
Plaintiff: NABIL ELMACHTOUB, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, JAMES L. BURCH, GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH BRADLEY, PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant - Appellee: ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., HARVEY J. BERGER, FRANK G. HALUSKA and others
Defendant: DAVID E. I. PYOTT, MIKE R. BOWLIN, JOHN T. CARDIS and others
Movant: JOSEPH MASSAGLIA, KENNETH CANAWAY, ERSTE-SPARINVEST KAPITALANLAGEGESELLSCHAFT M. B. H. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?