Cases 1 - 10 of 64
ODUMS v. KINTOCK GROUP et al
as 2:2018cv05541
Defendant:
KINTOCK GROUP, CRISTAL MILLER, KINTOCK GROUP III and others
Plaintiff:
ELONZIO ODUMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MILLER v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2012cv04470
Plaintiff:
LIONELL G. MILLER
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, GREG BARTKOWSKI, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAVARRIAGA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2012cv04313
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA CHAVARRIAGA
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFREY S. CHIESA , GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
COOK v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2012cv02675
Plaintiff:
QUAMI COOK
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREG BARTKOWSKI, GARY M. LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANN v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2011cv05742
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CANN
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, GREG BARTKOWSKI, CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. BARTKOWSKI et al
as 3:2011cv05265
Petitioner:
LOUIS PIERCE
Respondent:
GREG BARTKOWSKI and PAULA T. DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GILREATH v. BARTKOWSKI et al
as 3:2011cv05228
Petitioner:
BRYAN DOYLE GILREATH
Respondent:
GREG BARTKOWSKI and PAULA T. DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darby v. Bartkowski et al
as 3:2011cv04182
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DARREN DARBY
Respondent:
GREG BARTKOWSKI, Unknown Baltimore Officials and Doug Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HALL v. BARTKOWSKI et al
as 2:2011cv04148
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER HALL
Respondent:
GREG BARTKOWSKI and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MUSE v. BARTKOWSKI et al
as 2:2011cv04068
Petitioner:
JAHMIN MUSE
Respondent:
GREG BARTKOWSKI and PAULA T. DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
