Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Bryan v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv04614
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
White v. Hager, et al.
as 24-6836
Defendant:
LARRY HALL, CHARLES DANIELS, ERIC LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff:
TONEY A. WHITE
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-4371
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GITTERE, STEVEN SISOLAK and others
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
BRYAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21312
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BRYAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez v. Daniels et al
as 2:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Joseph Perez
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson, Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galdamez v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Eriberto Galdamez
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections, James D'Zurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammar Harris v. F. Dreesen, et al
as 23-15467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
F. DREESEN, MORIN, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 23-15466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Sam McFarland v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 22-17016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAM MCFARLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, MD MICHAEL MINEV, DR. HANF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
