Cases 1 - 10 of 80
New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, et al v. Trump, et al
as 25-1348
Plaintiff:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INDONESIAN COMMUNITY SUPPORT, LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS and MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, in their official capacity, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KRISTI NOEM, in their official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Interested Party:
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC., AMERICA'S FUTURE and others
Gun Owners of America, Inc., et al v. Pamela Bondi, et al
as 25-1282
Plaintiff:
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC., GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE and others
Movant:
GUN OWNERS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Defendant:
PAMELA BONDI, U.S. Attorney General, United States Attorney General, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and others
State of Washington, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 25-807
Plaintiff:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAS FUTURE, INC., ANDREW STEVEN BIGGS, BENJAMIN LEE CLINE and others
BERGMANN-SCHOCH et al v. PLATKIN et al
as 1:2025cv00997
Plaintiff:
HEIDI BERGMANN-SCHOCH, COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW PLATKIN, COLONEL PATRICK J. CALLAHAN and SCOTT A. COFFINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richards, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 25-693
Plaintiff:
ADAM RICHARDS, GERALD CLARK, JESSE HARRIS and others
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, ROB BONTA and DOES
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. et al v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2025cv00235
Plaintiff:
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. and GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION
Defendant:
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Washington et al v. Trump et al
as 2:2025cv00127
Plaintiff:
State of Washington, State of Arizona, State of Illinois and others
Defendant:
Donald Trump, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Social Security Administration and others
Interested Party:
Vincent Dale Ross and Mark Marvin
Amicus Curiae:
72 Local Governments and Officials, America's Future, Gun Owners of America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Cody R. Hart, Derrill J. Fussell and James J O'Hagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support et al v. Trump et al
as 1:2025cv00038
Plaintiff:
New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support, League of United Latin American Citizens and Make the Road New York
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, US Department of Homeland Security, US Department of Homeland Security, Secretary and others
Amicus Curiae:
Local Governments and Local Government Officials, Gun Owners of America, Inc., America's Future and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Richards, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-6940
Plaintiff:
GUN OWNERS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., an individual, GAALSWYK ENTERPRISES, INC., an individual doing business as Smokin Barrel Firearms, JEFFREY VANDERMEULEN and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and DOES, 1-10
Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, et al v. Bureau of ATF, et al
as 24-3200
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Hans Hummel, In his Official Capacity as the Director of Industry and Operations for the Saint Paul Field Division of the ATF, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Gun Owners Foundation, Morehouse Enterprises, LLC, doing business as Bridge City Ordinance and Gun Owners of America, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
