Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lewis v. Riverview, City of et al
as 5:2023cv12531
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Gail Lewis
Defendant:
Riverview, City of, Matthew Lyles and Michael McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demond Mimms v. Gail Lewis, et al
as 16-56868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMOND MAURICE MIMMS
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL LEWIS and OSCAR PENA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sharon Pierce, et al v. Springfield Township, Ohio, et al
as 13-3720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARON PIERCE, Individually and as administratrix of the Estate of, obo Cordell Lamar Drummond, JASON DRUMMOND and GAIL LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP, OHIO, MARC DOWNS, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee of Springfield Township, Ohio, JOSEPH R. POWERS, Individually and in his official capacity as an employee of Springfield Township, Ohio and others
Demond Mimms v. Gail Lewis et al
as 2:2012cv10769
Defendant:
Darryl Adams, George Galaza, Gail Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Demond Mimms
Donna Baltimore v. Harrisburg Parking Authority, et al
as 10-3153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA BALTIMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRISBURG PARKING AUTHORITY, MARK YOBBI, GAIL LEWIS and others
Gutzman v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02824
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Gutzman
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Gail Lewis, James Yates and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Welbon v. Burnett et al
as 3:2007cv04248
Plaintiff:
Eddie C. Welbon
Defendant:
Arthur B. Burnett, Lillian Roberts, Helen Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Baltimore v. Harrisburg Parking Authority et al
as 1:2007cv01244
Plaintiff:
Donna Baltimore
Defendant:
Harrisburg Parking Authority, Mark Yobbi, Gail Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
