Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheila Smith v. Gail Jones, et al
as 23-2894
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sheila Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Gail R. Jones, Dr. and Tommy Wenseleck
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-2227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER, a/k/a Dwayne Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
IVAN T. GILMORE, Warden, A. HICKS, Assistant Warden, K. H. TUCKER, Institutional Ombudsman and others
Defendant:
COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region, MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region and others
DeWayne Baker v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6009
Defendant / Appellee:
STETVEN A. JONES, Captain, SERGEANT T. H. WILLIAMSON, JANE DOE, Medical Contractor Mediko employee and others
Defendant:
MARCUS M. HODGES, Regional Administrator Central Region, COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER, T. HARVEY, Regional Ombudsman Central Region and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEWAYNE BAKER
Lee v. Brown et al
as 7:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Stacy Y. Brown, T. Doe Blankenship, Kenneth A. Goldman and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hiawatha Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smalls v. Kanode et al
as 7:2018cv00581
Defendant:
Brenda Raviee, John Doe, Chris Rine and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene V. Smalls, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Coffeewood Correctional Center
as 7:2018cv00382
Defendant:
S. W. Rogers, Baldwin, S. L. Stull and others
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeAndre Jackson v. David Robinson
as 16-7099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANDRE L'OVERTURE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, GAIL R. JONES, DAVID ZOOK and others
Smith v. Jones et al
as 4:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Sheila Smith
Defendant:
Gail R Jones and Tommy Wenseleck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
