Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Galante et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01933
Plaintiff:
Paul Galante and Bonnie Galante
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
D. Diaz v. Michel Rey Moore et al
as 2:2023cv10018
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SWEENEY v. GOOGLE, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv20978
Plaintiff:
Conor Sweeney
Defendant:
GOOGLE, INC., ALPHABET INC, GOOGLE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 23-946
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Howard Redmond, NYPD Inspector, sued in individual and official capacities, Ralph Nieves, former NYPD Lieutenant, sued in individual and official capacities and others
Galante v. Watermark Services IV, LLC
as 6:2023cv06227
Plaintiff:
Kailee Galante
Defendant:
Watermark Services IV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Galante v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv12488
Plaintiff:
Stephen Galante
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline plc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(SS) Galante v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
Amy Galante
Defendant:
Kilolo Kajakzi and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Komatsu v. The City of New York et al
as 22-1996
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
The City of New York, Howard Redmond, NYPD Inspector, sued in individual and official capacities, Ralph Nieves, former NYPD Lieutenant, sued in individual and official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
