Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 843
Wilson v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-1818
Petitioner: LUKE NOEL WILSON
Respondent: MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden, Avenal State Prison and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Hill v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-1583
Petitioner: NATHAN HILL
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party: GAVIN NEWSOM, RALPH DIAZ, Director of CDCR, KEN CLARK, Warden of CSP-Corcoran and others
(PC) Porter v. Icban et al
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff: Kevin Lamar Porter
Defendant: T. Icban, D. Leyto, S. Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavazos v. Mira Bahia Corpus Christi LP, et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: Daniel Cavazos
Defendant: MIRA BAHIA CORPUS CHRISTI LP, PROPORTIONAL PROSPERITY, L.L.C. and Marco Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Felix Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff: Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Gamboa v. Espinoza
as 3:2024cv00350
Plaintiff: Laura Gamboa
Defendant: Halle Isabella Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
United States v. Michael Gamboa
as 24-1387
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Michael Gerald Gamboa
Yu v. Ndoh, et al.
as 24-958
Petitioner: DANIEL YU
Respondent: ROSEMARY NDOH, Warden, MARTIN GAMBOA, Avenal State Prison and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest
US v. Moises Gamboa
as 24-6123
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MOISES GAMBOA, a/k/a Mo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?