Cases 1 - 10 of 28
GANT v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv00821
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
KALIF V. GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANT v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv05177
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL CLARK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSLYVANIA and others
Petitioner:
KALIF V. GANT and MR. KALIF V. GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANT v. MARLER et al
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
JEFFREY NASH, MICHAEL W. CARROLL, MRS. KNOX and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH GANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANT v. RAGONE
as 2:2018cv04228
Defendant:
DEAN ANTHONY RAGONE
Plaintiff:
EDWIN PAUL GANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GANT v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2017cv00046
Petitioner:
JERRY L. GANT
Respondent:
THOMPSON and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gant v. Thompson et al
as 3:2016cv02310
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Gant
Respondent:
Thompson and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GANT v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2015cv04468
Petitioner:
KALIF GANT
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GANT
as 5:2015cv02945
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BARBARA A. GANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
JOHNSON et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2013cv05667
Plaintiff:
GERALD JOHNSON, DAVID YODER, JASON DUFF and others
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
