Cases 11 - 20 of 378
Williams et al v. Old Navy, LLC
as 4:2023cv02892
Plaintiff:
Rekell Williams and Z. W. (a minor, represented by Rekell Williams)
Defendant:
Old Navy, LLC and The Gap, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rosa Galvan v. The Gap Inc.
as 4:2023cv02539
Plaintiff:
Rosa Galvan
Defendant:
The Gap Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Design Gaps, Inc. v. Shelter, LLC
as 23-1729
Petitioner / Appellant:
DESIGN GAPS, INC., DAVID GLOVER and EVA GLOVER
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELTER, LLC, JASON HIGHSMITH and KACIE M. HIGHSMITH
SALIJAJ v. OLD NAVY, LLC
as 3:2023cv02893
Plaintiff:
BURBUQUE SALIJAJ
Defendant:
OLD NAVY, LLC I/P/A GAP INC. D/B/A OLD NAVY, OLD NAVY, LLC other GAP INC doing business as OLD NAVY, JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brown et al v. Old Navy LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Roxann Brown and Michelle Smith
Defendant:
Old Navy LLC, Old Navy (Apparel) LLC, Old Navy Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
GIFTCASH INC. v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02146
Plaintiff:
GIFTCASH INC.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Banana Republic, LLC, Old Navy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Design Gaps, Inc. et al v. Hall et al
as 3:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Design Gaps, Inc., David Glover and Eva Glover
Defendant:
Jocelyn Hall, Hall Interiors, LLC, Peters Custom Homes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
