Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Navog LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.,
as 0:2025cv60328
Plaintiff:
Navog LLC
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Navog LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.,
as 1:2025cv20787
Plaintiff:
Navog LLC
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Peregrine Data LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.,
as 0:2025cv60317
Plaintiff:
Peregrine Data LLC
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Peregrine Data LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.,
as 0:2025cv60318
Plaintiff:
Peregrine Data LLC
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Smith et al v. Garmin International, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Marie Smith, Nathan Alexander Smith, Tabatha Marie Colbaugh and others
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rosenberg v. Garmin International, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02289
Plaintiff:
Gary Rosenberg
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cardiacsense LTD v. Garmin International, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11368
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cardiacsense LTD
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ROSENBERG v. GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
as 2:2024cv05761
Plaintiff:
GARY ROSENBERG
Defendant:
GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wisconsin Archery Products, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02076
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Archery Products, LLC
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
