Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Boyd v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Boyd
Defendant:
Kristen Harris, Lyndsey Van Buskirk, Cheryl Mabray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mock v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Garret Mock
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Shoemaker et al v. E360 LLC
as 3:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Garret Shoemaker and Patrick Buckley
Defendant:
E360 LLC doing business as E360 Sport
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Branson v. Britt et al
as 4:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Guy D. Branson
Defendant:
Michael Britt, Kody Schur, Garret Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laura Garrett and Michael Garrett, Sr. v. Comal County, et al
as 5:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
Laura Garret, Michael Garret, Laura Garrett and others
Defendant:
Comal County, Lieutenant Mark W. Reynolds, Orlando Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hulsey v. Bates et al
as 5:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Garret Saxton, Joy Hughes, Lorrie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hulsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Elmer et al
as 6:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Sue Torrez, Unknown Purvis, Norris Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Eunicholas E Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
