Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Bailey et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00622
Plaintiff: Teresa M. Bailey and Gary David Bailey
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary Bailey v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 19-30567
Petitioner / Appellant: GARY A. BAILEY
Respondent / Appellee: DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Gary Bailey v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30464
Petitioner - Appellant: GARY A. BAILEY
Respondent - Appellee: DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Gary Bailey v. Darrel Vannoy, et al
as 18-30430
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY A. BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee: DARREL VANNOY, Head Warden, TRACY FALGOUT, Assistant Warden and AIMEE ZAUNBRECHER, Licensed Practical Nurse
Bailey v. Vannoy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00597
Plaintiff: Gary A Bailey
Defendant: Darrell Vannoy and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Dagil et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00147
Plaintiff: Gary Dean Bailey
Defendant: FNU Dagil, B McShan, V Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Counsel Substitute Dagil et al
as 4:2017cv01066
Plaintiff: Gary Dean Bailey
Defendant: Counsel Substitute Dagil, B McShan, V. Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2017cv00089
Petitioner: Gary A. Bailey, Jr.
Respondent: Jeff Landry and Darrell Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary Bailey v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10173
Petitioner - Appellant: GARY LEWIS BAILEY
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
In re: Gary Bailey
as 16-30708
Petitioner: In re: GARY A. BAILEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?