Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Anderson v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Gary Anderson
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stencel et al v. White River Academy et al
as 2:2014cv00331
Plaintiff:
Ryan Stencel , Shawn Stencel and Mark Stencel
Defendant:
White River Academy, Justin Neilson, Gary Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 5:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Rose Heinrichs Thompson
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, Karen Hirsch, Jamie Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Harrison et al
as 5:2014cv00368
Petitioner:
Cynthia Thompson
Respondent:
S Harrison, Mary Fallin and Gary Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howard v. Ehrenworth et al
as 3:2013cv00661
Plaintiff:
James C. Howard
Defendant:
Scott Ehrenworth and Gary Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington v. Wallace
as 2:2013cv00084
Plaintiff:
Gary Covington , Bethany Walker , Gary Anderson and others
Defendant:
Uless Wallace , Dale Acosta, Travis Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-12245
Plaintiff:
Diane Anderson and Gary Anderson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Anderson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12245
Plaintiff:
Diane Anderson and Gary Anderson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv02325
Plaintiff:
GARY ANDERSON , OLLIE ANDERSON , PHILLIP M. CANCIK and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
