Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Prude v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv01039
Petitioner:
Terrance Prude
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Sanchez Wilson
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoffmann, Alan v. Boughton, Gary
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Alan Hoffman and Alan Hoffmann
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Demoyne Davis
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv01371
Petitioner:
DeWayne D Knight
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coughlin, Donald v. Boughton, Gary
as 3:2023cv00659
Petitioner:
Donald P. Coughlin
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linton v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv01180
Petitioner:
Alvin E Linton, III
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson, Willie v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Willie Simpson
Respondent:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Wisconsin Secure Program Facility and Warden Gary Boughton
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tinnon v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv00493
Petitioner:
Andre L Tinnon
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hopson v. Boughton
as 2:2023cv00457
Petitioner:
Antwan D Hopson
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.