Cases 1 - 10 of 33
COX JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21567
Plaintiff:
GARY COX JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COX v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02111
Plaintiff:
GARY COX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2021dp20012
Plaintiff:
Gary Cox
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. and DePuy International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cox v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Gary Cox
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and DePuy International, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Lawrence Hogan
as 20-2311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. JAMES WICKHAM, REV. FREDRICK CAUDLE, DELEGATE WARREN MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WOODROW W. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Maryland State Police Superintendent, JINLENE CHAN, in her official capacity as Acting Deputy Secretary for Public Health Services, DENNIS R. SHRADER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Maryland Health Department and others
Plaintiff:
REV. GARY POMRENKE and ADVENTURE PARK USA, LLC
Bolin et al v. Trinity Property Management LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00885
Plaintiff:
Chad Bolin, Stephen Tucker, Richard Burton and others
Defendant:
Tri 5 Jacksonville LLC, Andmark Chapel Ridge of Conway LLC and Trinity Property Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Antietam Battlefield KOA v. Lawrence Hogan
as 20-1579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REV. JAMES WICKHAM, REV. FREDRICK CAUDLE, DELEGATE WARREN MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCES B. PHILLIPS, in her official capacity as Dpt. Sec. for Public Health Services, WOODROW W. JONES, III, in his official capacity as Maryland State Police Superintendent, LAWRENCE HOGAN, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff:
REV. GARY POMRENKE
Antietam Battlefield et al v. Hogan et al
as 1:2020cv01130
Plaintiff:
Rev. James Wickham, Delegate Warren Miller, David Serenda and others
Defendant:
Woodrow W. Jones, III, Frances B. Phillips, Robert J. Neall and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cutler
Amicus Curiae:
Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6055
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
DEBORAH ALLEN, RONALD BAYER, MITCHELL KATZ and others
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
