Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Cacho v. United Tax Defense LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cacho
Defendant:
United Tax Defense LLC, Gary Craig and John Does 1-18
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Gary Rosales v. Q. Byrne, et al
as 23-15081
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY CRAIG ROSALES
Respondent / Appellee:
Q. BYRNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Gary Craig Smith v. Conair Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv02443
Plaintiff:
Gary Craig Smith
Defendant:
Conair Corporation and Conair Corporation doing business as Cuisinart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig et al v. Sullivan County, Tennessee et al (PLR2)
as 2:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Bradley Craig , Gary Craig and Jerry Craig
Defendant:
Sullivan County, Tennessee, City of Bristol, Tennessee , Washington County, Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Democrat and Chronicle et al
as 1:2017cv00861
Plaintiff:
Damon Montgomery
Defendant:
Democrat and Chronicle, Gary Craig, William Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kathy Craig et al v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2017cv00491
Defendant:
County of Orange, Does and Nicholas Petropulos
Plaintiff:
Gary Craig, Kathy Craig and Gary Witt
United States of America v. Craig
as 2:2016cv02373
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gary Craig
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181
Rosales v. Byrne et al
as 3:2016cv00003
Respondent:
Q. Byrne and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gary Craig Rosales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solomon v. Taylor, Town of et al
as 3:2015cv08164
Plaintiff:
Gary Craig Solomon
Defendant:
Taylor, Town of , Aruin Palmer , John Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solomon v. Higgins
as 3:2015cv08148
Plaintiff:
Gary Craig Solomon
Defendant:
Robert J Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
