Cases 21 - 30 of 249
Hollingsworth v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Richard Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Kim T. Thomas, Gary Hetzel, Ronzella Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulwise v. Hetzel et al
as 5:2013cv01767
Petitioner:
Derrick Wayne Fulwise
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Hetzel
as 1:2013cv00460
Petitioner:
Laddarios Wright
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lamar v. Hetzel
as 1:2013cv00422
Petitioner:
Dennis Earl Lamar
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Hetzel (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00556
Plaintiff:
Anthony Patterson
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv00385
Petitioner:
Deric LaVelle May
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Kathey Holt and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lanier
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewster v. Hetzel et al
as 4:2013cv01279
Petitioner:
Sumnar Robert Brewster
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLeod v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jackie McLeod
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonds v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
James Willis Bonds
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
