Cases 31 - 40 of 270
Lamar v. Hetzel
as 1:2013cv00422
Petitioner:
Dennis Earl Lamar
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Hetzel (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00556
Plaintiff:
Anthony Patterson
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv00385
Petitioner:
Deric LaVelle May
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Kathey Holt and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lanier v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lanier
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brewster v. Hetzel et al
as 4:2013cv01279
Petitioner:
Sumnar Robert Brewster
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLeod v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jackie McLeod
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Tate v. Gary Hetzel
as 13-11519
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK EARHEART TATE
Respondent - Appellee:
GARY HETZEL
Bonds v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
James Willis Bonds
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQuarley v. Sconyers, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carlos McQuarley
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Derrick Carter and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Sgt. Hampton and Officer Bettis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
