Cases 31 - 40 of 250
Bonds v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00203
Plaintiff:
James Willis Bonds
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQuarley v. Sconyers, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carlos McQuarley
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Derrick Carter and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Sgt. Hampton and Officer Bettis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Hetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Thomas, Michael Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2013cv00446
Petitioner:
Corey Eugene Benton
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bass v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Tommy Bass
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Luther Strange, Cynthia Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livingston v. Hetzel, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jonathan C. Livingston
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Sgt. Williams, Rodney Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Nathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Nathan Williams
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Metcalf v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Metcalf
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kim Tobias Thomas and Rodney Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
