Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kemp v. McCarthy
as 1:2024cv00504
Petitioner:
Gary Kemp
Respondent:
Kevin McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kemp v. Noeth
as 1:2020cv10012
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Gary Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kemp v. Noeth
as 1:2020cv09121
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Gary Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kemp v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2017cv03565
Plaintiff:
Gary Kemp
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kemp et al v. Financial Freedom
as 1:2016cv03533
Plaintiff:
James Gary Kemp
Defendant:
Financial Freedom
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Trading Tech Intl, et al v. eSpeed Inc
as 1:2004cv05312
Plaintiff:
Trading Technologies International, Inc. and Gary Kemp
Defendant:
eSpeed, Inc., Ecco LLC, ITS Ecco Holdings Ltd and others
Not Yet Classified:
Paul E Schaafsma and Board of Trade of the City of Chicago
Intervenor:
Futures Industry Association and Managed Funds Association
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kemp v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00622
Plaintiff:
Gary Kemp
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC vs. Trading Technologies International, Inc et, al.
as 1:2005cv04088
Plaintiff:
Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC
Defendant:
Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Respondent:
Stephen Lesavich, Dowell Baker P.C., Anthony E Dowell and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Gary Kemp
Petitioner:
Harris Brumfield, George C. Summerfield, Steven R. Pedersen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kemp v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2010cv00327
Plaintiff:
Gary Kemp
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
