Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wilson v. Wakeman
as 3:2023cv05931
Plaintiff:
Mario Wilson
Defendant:
Gary Wakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clayton v. Strange et al
as 3:2022cv06015
Plaintiff:
James Edward Clayton and Okie Redpaw
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Casey Kaech, Lara Stick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinton Brown v. Margaret Gilbert, et al
as 20-35376
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY WAKEMAN, Chaplain, Stafford Creek Correction Cener, BELINDA STEWART, Religious Program Manager, DOC Headquarters, MARGARET GILBERT, Supt, Stafford Creek Correction Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTON P. BROWN
Lewis v. Stewart et al
as 3:2020cv05248
Defendant:
Dennis Dahne, Ron Haynes, Margaret Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
David D Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Rollins v. Gary Wakeman, et al
as 19-35549
Defendant / Appellee:
BRAD SIMPSON, in their individual capacities, GARY WAKEMAN and BELINDA STEWART
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES W. ROLLINS
Samuel Piatnitsky v. Belinda Stewart, et al
as 19-35478
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY WAKEMAN, DENNIS DAHNE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL M. PIATNITSKY
Brown v. Wakeman et al
as 3:2018cv05416
Plaintiff:
Quinton P Brown
Defendant:
Gary Wakeman, Jeneva Cotton, Margaret Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rollins v. Wakeman et al
as 3:2017cv05943
Plaintiff:
James W Rollins
Defendant:
Gary Wakeman, Belinda Stewart and Brad Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piatnitsky v. Stewart et al
as 3:2017cv05486
Plaintiff:
Samuel M Piatnitsky
Defendant:
Belinda Stewart, Gary Wakeman, Margaret Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Glebe et al
as 3:2009cv05747
Plaintiff:
Darrick Jennings
Defendant:
Pat Glebe and Gary Wakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
